ROBUST H2020 project
  • Home
  • Objectives
  • Work Plan
    • WP 1: Seabed mining and operational requirements of AUV.
    • WP2: LIBS development
    • WP3: Automatic recognition of mining targets
    • WP4: Sea bed mapping and volume measurement
    • WP5: AUV and manipulator development
    • WP6: Control architecture
    • WP7: Manufacturing, integration and preliminary testing
    • WP8: Large scale trials and LCCA
    • WP9: Dissemination and exploitation
    • WP 10: Management and Coordination
    • WP 11: Environmental Protection Question Requirement.
  • Partners
  • News
  • Publications
  • Contact us
  • Files
  • Intranet
  • Privacy

WP6: Control architecture

  • Home
  • WP6: Control architecture

WP6 “Control architecture” focuses on the whole-body control of the overall underwater vehicle manipulator system (UVMS). The control system is in charge of executing a bathymetric survey of an area of interest, on the basis of which the UVMS autonomously chooses the most promising area where the mining nodules could be found. Then, the UVMS performs a successive, low altitude survey, where optical sensors can detect the nodules. Whenever a possible nodule is found, the control system guides the UVMS to land on the seafloor, and then moves the LIBS attached to the manipulator close to the detected nodule.

The control system developed in WP6 follows a hierarchical approach (Fig. 1), where a kinematic control layer generates reference velocities for an underlying dynamic control layer.

Figure 1: the ROBUST control system architecture

Owing to the modular structure of the ROBUST UVMS, the dynamic control layer exploits a specific dynamic model developed within WP6, based on the composition of the dynamic models of basic elements, as shown in Fig. 2.

Figure 2: basic elements composing the dynamic model of the ROBUST UVMS

Finally, the Kinematic control layer implements a task priority inverse kinematics framework. This framework allows the UVMS to take care of many concurrent control objectives, such as following the survey path, while maintaining a given altitude from the seafloor, aligning to the desired velocity to reduce energy consumption (i.e. avoiding later translations), and so on. As an example of multi objective behaviour, Fig. 3 shows the control system aligning the vehicle to the nodule, and keeping the vehicle at a distance within two predetermined thresholds, before the final landing is accomplished. This is necessary to make sure that the nodule to be inspected is within the manipulator’s workspace during the subsequent manipulation phase, which is occurring when the vehicle has landed.

Figure 3: the UVMS aligns itself to the nodule, and regulates its distance to keep the nodule within the manipulator’s workspace

Recent Posts

  • Pressure housing successful test up to 600 bar
  • LIBS system ready for its journey to the Pacific Ocean
  • Successful integration of the LIBS system into the pressure housing
  • LIBS Housing ready for new endeavors
  • LIBS Press Release

Archives

  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • June 2018
BACK TO TOP

Social

Follow me on:

© Robust. All Rights Reserved.